Skip to content

Hollis v. Merchant Row Holdings

Case setup
Marcus Hollis v. Merchant Row Holdings, LLCU.S. District Court, Northern District of Illinois, Eastern DivisionCase no. 1:25-cv-04481

Key facts

The terms your team works from, as the settlement agreement states them.

Settlement amount
$3,250,000
Class members
2,150
The fund earns interest
Not stated
Type of claims
Consumer privacy (FACTA receipts)
How people get paid
Not set yet
Tax treatment
100% non-wage payments (1099-MISC where required)
Escalator
None, the amount is fixed
Leftover money goes to
Not set yet

Summary

Claims-made settlement for about 2,150 cardholders whose receipts showed more than the last five card digits. The agreement is silent on how payments are made, and two stipulations of the same date name different cy pres recipients.

Added by ApexOSOct 24, 2026

Deadlines

Every deadline is met.

4 deadlines metShow

  • Class data from Merchant Row

    Nov 3, 202628 days after preliminary approvalMarked as met by Chris Skaling

  • Summary notice by email and postcard

    Nov 17, 202642 days after preliminary approvalMarked as met by Chris Skaling

  • Opt-out and objection deadline

    Jan 16, 202760 days after the notice dateMarked as met by Chris Skaling

  • Claims deadline

    Jan 31, 202775 days after the notice dateMarked as met by Chris Skaling

Questions for counsel

2 questions waiting for an answer from counsel.

  • The agreement does not say how approved claimants are paid. Should payments go out by check, by electronic payment, or should claimants choose?

    Asked by CaseIQ

  • Two stipulations dated June 20, 2026 name different cy pres recipients: Chicago Legal Clinic, Inc. and the Greater Chicago Food Depository. Which one controls Section 10.1?

    Asked by CaseIQ

Notes

Anything your team should know about this case. Each note keeps the name of who wrote it.

Activity on this case

Everything people and assistants did here, newest first.

  1. Chris Skaling

    Ticked off "Answer the open questions with counsel"

  2. Chris Skaling

    Marked "Claims deadline" as met

  3. Chris Skaling

    Marked "Opt-out and objection deadline" as met

  4. Chris Skaling

    Marked "Summary notice by email and postcard" as met

  5. Chris Skaling

    Marked "Class data from Merchant Row" as met

  6. Chris Skaling

    Approved: Hollis v. Merchant Row Holdings – case setup

    Approved

  7. CaseIQAI assistant

    Drafted 2 questions for counsel

  8. CaseIQAI assistant

    Read 3 documents and prepared the case setup sheet

    Made with Modulify